Critical Thinking Styles

             cameras placed strategically in and around the building complex.
             One evening, a burglar managed to get inside the building in the executives office area, and took numerous personal computers and airline ticket stocks. In spite of the established security measures, the burglar was able to get in and out of the building without being caught by the security guard. The robbery was not discovered until the following morning when one of the staff came early that morning and found out the office equipment were gone. .
             An investigation of the incident was conducted, and all employees that left after business hours on that day were questioned. Each of those employees was interrogated in a secluded room, and the staff ensured that they were not able to talk to each other to discuss anything about the incident. The investigation revealed that not one of the employees knew anything or had any involvement with the incident. The question on security measures then came up, and an evaluation of the procedures was initiated. The evaluation revealed that both the guard and the last employee that left building that day made a mistake. The employee did not check the door to ensure that it was locked and secured upon leaving the building, and the guard did not perform the regular security check that he was supposed to do throughout the evening during his tour of duty. The incident should have never happened if both the security guard and the employee followed security procedures. The guard was relieved from his duty, and the employee, well, she is still employed. Since she was one of the executives, it was never revealed whether she was reprimanded or not for the incident. .
             .
             Critical Thinking Styles 4.
             With the outcome of the investigation, the security strategy of the company was reassess and identified areas of weakness to ensure that such security breach would not happen again.