This was the first court case that applied the Establishment Clause to state law and started an ongoing struggle for the Court to balance the needs of both the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. However, the Supreme Court was incorrect with their ruling because they took a loose interpretation of the separation of church and state, when they should have taken a stricter interpretation because by stating that there is a clear wall of separation between church and state affairs, a public school and a Catholic should not be sharing state money that was given by taxpayers, and therefore violates the Establishment Clause. .
The Establishment Clause found in the first article of the First Amendment in the Constitution forbids the government to create any laws that respect the formation or "establishment" of any religion. This clause does not permit the government to do anything that excessively and unfairly gives special treatment to a specific religion over another as well as prohibiting the establishment of an official religion within the government. It government is also not allowed to clearly have a preference in religion more than non-religion or non-religion more than religion (Establishment Clause). The loose interpretation that was put on the Establishment Clause in the Everson vs. The Board of Education violates the clause and destroys the wall between church and state, which takes away citizen's rights, therefore making the Supreme Court ruling unconstitutional. .
Although the Establishment Clause was broadly structured, it should not be taken into loose interpretation because since the government cannot establish a church, therefore it cannot respect the establishment of religion within the government, proving how the reimbursement was unconstitutional. This is what Justice Wiley Rutledge argues in his dissenting opinion against the Supreme Court's ruling for the case.
Separation of Church and State According to Mary Pitman Kitch removing the phrase, "under God" from "The Pledge of Allegiance" undermines our national heritage. She believes that it will cause millions of Americans to be outraged because most people think of the word "God" that is used in "...
In the 1947 case of Everson vs. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th amendment (Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. ... However, if we were simply to implant prayer as an every day event in our children's education, there would be even more debates then there is currently because many people feel that organized prayer will lead to many problems. ...
For instance the Everson vs. Board of Education case established the separation of church and state. ... Due to the West Virginia State Board of Education vs. ... As they stated in this release,"" Newdow has standing as a parent to challenge a practice that interferes with his right to direct the religious education of his daughter."" ... I have had the pleasure of going through the state of Missouri public education system. ...
The swords are drawn, the line in the sand is defined, and the Constitution and the very spirit of America hang in the balance. The twenty first century will see the next step in our growth as a free republic. And whether it is a step taken back or a step taken forward is yet to be determined. While passionate feelings and thoughts will be considered, in the United States it is ultimately the law of the land, embodied in our Constitution that must be the final setting for a conclusion. We must find in our law the answer and to do so requires a study of the Constitution, its meaning, its i...