For example, the double use of the word "dread" implies that the creator of the tiger is even more dreadful than the creature itself. That questions the nature of God. Whereas the last two lines of the The Lamb sound like refrain and the phrase "little lamb" signifies the innocent character of the child and of his creator. Both poems consist of only one exclamatory sentence, each emphasizing respectively on the good and bad nature of Him and thus referring to the contrary states of human nature, because man is created on the analogy of the image of God. Major difference in the language used in the two poems is that in The Tyger Blake uses much more diverse words than in The Lamb. The simple rhymes and the regular rhythm stress the simple ideas that are implied, but "though many believe that Blake's poems are written in a simple language, no one can deny the presence of deep meaning" (Pakzadian and Moinzadeh 114 ). The language of the child is simple and is a sign for his innocence, while the variety of words used by the adult shows his experience and change of understandings of the world and God.
Blake's spelling of the title suggests the dangerous and unfamiliar nature of the beast. Throughout the poem Blake implies that the tiger is the embodiment of God`s power in creation. Some critics believe that "the revolution, like the animal symbolizing it, belongs to a power beyond the control of human agents" (Burowski). However, the religious aspect in both poems cannot be denied. In the second stanza of The Tyger we can find a reference to the Greek mythology and more specifically the myth of Prometheus who gave the fair to the people (Moore). The images in the poem suggest the mightiness of God and his immortality. The third stanza conveys that the creator is also an artist- he creates his sculptures in the way he wants them to be even if it means that they will be dreadful, but this only shows his power.