Pro-choicers, on the other hand, feel that a fetus does not get the title of a person because it does not exemplify the traits that are central to the concept of personhood (Pojman, p. 544). They say that a person is best considered as a "full-fledged member of the moral community."" (Pojman, p. 543).
The traits that are central to the concept of personhood (humanity in the moral sense) are:.
Consciousness and the ability to feel pain.
Reasoning.
Self-motivated activity.
Capacity to communicate.
Presence of self-concepts and self-awareness.
These traits are said to not be a necessity, but good candidates for necessary conditions. A being with none of these traits is essentially not a person, just that of genetic humanity. (Pojman, p. 544).
With that being said, genetic humanity neither necessary nor sufficient for establishing an entity as a person. "Some human beings are not people and there may well be people who are not human beings."" Someone's identity as a person can be nullified when the traits mentioned above never existed or ceased to exist. This allows us to say that "a fetus is a human being which is not yet a person, and which therefore cannot coherently be said to have full moral rights."" (Pojman, p. 545).
There is actually evidence about personhood found in the Bible. It says in Genesis 2:7.
And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
This illustrates that God did not give man a soul until he bore him, which is contradictory to what most Catholics believe, that the soul enters the body before birth. The Bible can then be said to contradict itself in Psalm 139:13-16.
For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works: and that my soul knoweth right well. My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.