The Necklace Evaluation

            
            
             In Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace", a couple's life was spent paying off a debt for a necklace they had borrowed and lost. The main characters Mme. Loisel and her husband were invited to a prestigious ball. Therefore, Mme. Loisel was upset that this type of situation had to happen to her. Her husband saw Mme. Loisel under a lot of stress, and gave her money, he was going to use to purchase a gun for hunting, to purchase a dress so she could wear to the ball. Mme. Loisel was still not pleased because she was missing the jewelry that would make her look among the balls class. Her husband then suggested to her why not borrow jewelry from her good friend Mme. Forestier. Mme. Loisel thought it was a splendid idea. Mme. Loisel then went over to Mme. Forestier's house, and borrowed a beautiful diamond necklace. Mme. Loisel and her husband went to the ball; meanwhile, Mme. Loisel was having the time of her life her husband ended up falling asleep at the ball. The couple had left the ball; and when they got home Mme. Loisel noticed that she had lost the necklace. Her husband then went out looking for the necklace; after a while they finally accepted that the necklace was lost. Mme. Loisel and her husband decided not to tell Mme. Forestier the truth. Instead, the couple ended up spending ten years of their lives paying for the replacement they bought for Mme. Forestier. After the ten years had past Mme. Loisel ran into Mme. Forestier, and told Mme. Forestier what had happened .
             to the original necklace. Mme. Forestier tells Mme. Loisel that the original necklace was a cheap imitation.
             Evaluation.
             In "The Necklace" Guy de Maupassant seems to using a sympathetic tone; meanwhile at the same time a not so sympathetic tone. De Maupassant lets the reader fell sorry for Mme. Loisel at first "She was one of those pretty and charming girls who are sometimes, as if by mistake of destiny, born in a family of clerks" (60).