Kurosawa's brother demanded that he look upon the destruction, the scene of death. "Looking back on that excursion now, I realize that it must have been horrifying for my brother, too. It had been an expedition to conquer fear" (IMDb 1). Throughout Kurosawa's body of work, the topics of fear, death, violence, and exploitation have a major presence, often being the center foci. From this perspective, Kurosawa directed his films as expeditions to conquer fear, and Rashomon is no exception.
While the men under the gate entertain the testimonies, it is evident that their differing experiences and worldviews color how they interpret the trustworthiness of each account. Susan Sontag, an American author and literary and social critic, examined this idea of worldviews coloring one's interpretation of events depicted in photographs in her article "Looking at War". In the piece, Sontag quotes Virginia Woolf asking, "whether when we look at the same photographs we feel the same things," with the answer given by Rashomon being a resounding "no" (3). When two people view a picture, their own biases and opinions color their viewing of the picture, and subsequently their interpretation of what it depicts. As Sontag states, "To an Israeli Jew, a photograph of a child torn apart in the attack on the Sbarro pizzeria in downtown Jerusalem is first of all a photograph of a Jewish child killed by a Palestinian suicide bomber. To a Palestinian, a photograph of a child torn apart by a tank round in Gaza is first of all a photograph of a Palestinian child killed by Israeli ordnance." (Sontag 4). Perception of events goes through a similar filter, and is even more susceptible to mutation. This filtration affects the way people retell an event, and potentially distorts their very perception of the event. In the case of Rashomon, no photographic evidence was presented; it was simply four people with four different accounts, four people with conflicting interests, retelling something that happened.