Bronner also mentioned that this notion is interpreted politically into the concrete form as the constraints on institutional power and the expansion of individual freedom. Thus, in contemporary society, the Enlightenment ideals still maintain their influence by assimilating into political theories. Additionally, instead of appearing as metaphysical ideals, the Enlightenment ideas should take the form of specific actions.
In Chapter 1, Bronner strengthens his arguments on the necessity to present Enlightenment ideas with practical politics approaches because of their tight connections. He starts the argument with the analysis of the Dialectic of Enlightenment. Bronner criticizes that the book's overloaded with metaphysical analysis and academic writing style but never grasps "what was at stake." Reclaiming the Enlightenment, as Bronner raises as a positive example, takes a divergent approach in presenting the ideals of the Enlightenment. The strongest trait of the book is the constant connection between theory and practice, or the application of the Enlightenment ideas in politics. He builds up the connection by proving the irreplaceable influence of Enlightenment ideals on real life political theories. Although Bronner does notice the danger of reifying the "Enlightenment" and setting aside the metaphysical analysis, he believes that the accumulation of the different perspectives offered by different individuals under various situations is what contributes to the wide impact of the Enlightenment. Bronner remarks that Enlightenment ideals have already seeped into the formation of political theories by pointing out the liberal concepts buried within the left thoughts. In this way, Bronner uses concrete examples to prove that politics does offer the ground for the Enlightenment ideals to develop in the form of political ideals and social aims.
At the same time, Bronner also illustrates that the Enlightenment concept of political engagement "keeps democracy fresh and alive" (Bronner 9).