Conclusive evidence suggests that perhaps the Germans were bullied into defending what they thought was rightfully there's. A familiar question that is commonly heard in regards to the subject is whether or not German aims were shaped by the desire to establish there own place in European society.
as a nation that feels it's need to secure their position both defensively and economically or whether German policy was reactive, dictated by the fear of being encircled by a coalition of hostile powers. If it is true that Germany was driven by aggressive instincts, then of course Britain, France, and Russia were justified in preparing their defenses. The answers to these questions may never be unanimously agreed upon but there are a few puzzles that remain. Why did Germany's efforts to break the Triple Entente yield no more than momentary victories? Why was Britain so reluctant to apply to Germany, for the purpose of managing it in Europe, the same formula that had brought about an improvement in Anglo-French and Anglo-Russian relations.
This deteriorating situation leads readers to believe that the parties involved were not concerned with the ramifications of global war. Instead of weighing out their actions, the always present element of pride blinds the harsh reality of what might be our planet's first war of many nations. This same pride stands in the way of a chance to resolve the economic instabilities that have sprouted in Europe and cure any instabilities that Germany might have had in regards to its neighbors. .
Russo-German Treaty of bjorkoe, 24 July 1905 .
1. In the event that one of the two empires will be attacked by a European power, its ally will come to its assistance in Europe with all of its land and sea forces.
2. The high contracting parties pledge not to conclude a separate peace with any common enemy.
3. The present treaty will come into force as soon as peace between Russia and Japan has been made, and will remain valid unless notice is given one year in advance.
