2). For children to be exposed to such possible "subjective and physiological excitement- is irresponsible of media and society. The ability in which media shape popular culture has been researched frequently and in depth. Society accepts these programmable motives of the media even though the majority claims that they are against the fact that visual and audible depiction of pornography and profanity is a possible danger to children. Human beings by nature tend to follow what others find as entertaining, jump on the bandwagon, and endanger youngsters in following suite.
Today, according to the Sex On TV biennial report, the authors measure sexual messages that are presented to young audiences as such:.
For this study, sexual content is defined as any depiction of sexual activity, sexually suggestive behavior, or talk about sexual activity. Portrayals involving only talk about sex are measured separately from those that include sexual actions and behaviors . (P. 7).
Therefore, whatever sexual images are represented on television programs geared for youth and teenagers, the chosen "937- of them, have been quantitatively studied by Kunkel, Biely, Eyal, Cope-Farrar, Donnerstein, and Fandrich. The top twenty shows from this study are as follows, from the highest ranking to the lowest:.
Malcolm in the Middle; Simpsons; Bernie Mac; Friends; Greg the Bunny;.
Fear Factor; Survivor; Titus; 7th Heaven; King of the Hill; Grounded for .
Life; That 70s Show; Wonderful World of Disney; Andy Richter Controls .
the Universe; CSI; WWF Entertainment; Undeclared; The 80s Show; .
WWF Smackdown; Boston Public ( Nielsen Rating: Sex ON TV, p.7).
Believe-it-or-not, some of these shows have been viewed by my very own thirteen year old daughter. I have never objected to any of them because of the ratings that were given by the network channels. I was flabbergasted to find out that I was not carefully monitoring the programs my child watched.