He goes on to say "the marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidence by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone"(Rottenburg, 707). This was a very important part in his speech and argument because he made a point of making the whites feel where he was coming from. At the beginning it may have sounded as though this speech was directed at the whites from the blacks, but by making this last point he makes the whites feel included as well. Many people could have possibly made the assumption that this speech was not directed at everyone and was just targeted at the whites from the blacks, but that is not true. He constantly goes back to the point that it is our responsibility as humans to better our communities and this nation, which is true, but I think that he assumes that with no segregation everything will just flow perfectly and everyone will just get along. I don't think everyone will ever just get along because there is would be hate even if only one race existed. Violence exists regardless of segregation and prejudice, it always has and probably always will. He points out how there were white people there at the demonstration among the blacks. This makes and causes many whites to open their ears and listen to what he was saying, instead of closing them and completely tuning him out. He says that this is not just freedom for blacks, but freedom for everybody. Again he does a great job by including everyone in his speech and doesn't just stay on some black power shit, which in fact keeps everyone interested in what he was saying. I think that this could possibly be an appeal to value because he is targeted the values that we possess as human beings, looking past the color of our skin.
