When you are young you are taken to Church by your parents and you get pushed into religion at school. They are trying to put something into your mind. Obviously because nobody goes to Church and nobody believes in God. Why? Because they have not interpreted the Bible as it was intended. You are taught just to have faith, you do not have to worry about it, just believe what we are telling you (Harrison, 1986).
History is written by the winners. Seldom does one hear about opposing ideas because those ideas were discarded by the dominant hegemonic society. Those discarded beliefs and ideas helped interpret biblical events. .
At the Council of Nicea, one important decision was made regarding the future of Christianity. This decision was made by the ruling religious group. There were other sects of Christianity present, but their opinions and beliefs were discounted and labeled heresy. In this research paper, I will explore the beliefs of the Arian opposition in relation to the Trinity, what came to be accepted by the Church, and implications for social control by the Catholic Church. To explore this opposition, I will .
The Council: 2.
use rhetorical lenses to investigate their stance. The rhetorical lens I will use is hermeneutics of suspicion.
Interpreting texts is not to realize or understand the intentions of the narrator (the utterer's meaning), but to understand the meaning of the text itself (the utterance's meaning) (Wiklund, 2002, p114). When following the text beyond the situation and the intention s of the author, and beyond the reader's situation, the text discloses possible modes of being in the world that can be appropriated. Appropriation means to "make one's own- what was initially "alien- and is the aim of hermeneutics (Ricoeur, 1995, p185). To interpret is to appropriate here and now the intention of the text (Ricoeur, 1995, p185). Thus, the interpretation is complete when the reading releases something like an event, an event of discourse, an event of the present time.
