People who are against human cloning state many logical concerns of its effectiveness and need in our society. The fear of the unknown takes a toll on the human psyche particularly on this issue. Lewis Thomas (1913-1993), a physician and scientist, states that his reasons for opposing human cloning is because “there is no end to protocol”, meaning that in order to truly clone someone you would have to clone the people in their lives that had any affect on them as well which would be an endless task (Thomas 784). He also believes that the effects human cloning would have on society would be too traumatic. The scientist credited for “Dolly’s” existence explains that cloning would result in a high number of miscarriages and deaths among newborns, and openly speaks against his own type of research. Many religions also outwardly oppose the concept when taken to certain extremes, stating that it is unethical to alter with God’s work and it devalues human uniqueness and dignity. The National Bioethics Advisory Board adds to the argument with concerns about the technique’s effectiveness and possible medical risks involved or how possible future black markets for embryos could occur. The House of Representatives Majority Leader, Richard Armey, wants to ban human cloning forever for he says, ”this path leads to designer children, organ farms, and growing disregard for sanctity of life.”(Human Cloning Process)

Some topics in this essay:
George Pence, Lewis Thomas, Richard Seed, Ian Wilmut, Process Arguments, Bioethics Board, Cloning Process, Alzheimer’s Parkinson’s, Chip Cell”, Grenaly Stem, human cloning, cloning process, stem cell, stem cells, stem cell research, cell research, process human cloning, national bioethics, process human, cloning society, reproductive cloning, global change, human cloning process, human cloning society,