A primary reason to refrain from corporal punishment is the negative and unclear message it sends to a child. Spanking, slapping, or hitting does not teach a child what is right or wrong, but rather imposes a message of violence (Tharps 260). If a parent who uses violence to discipline tries to teach the same child that violence is wrong, they are relating an unclear message about violence and will confuse the adolescent. Corporal punishment suggests that violence is an acceptable way to solve a problem, which sends a negative message to childre

A second reason why corporal punishment is considered negative is because it can worsen the child’s behavior. Research has proven that the more frequently a child is exposed to corporal punishment, the worse a child behaves. Physical discipline tends to worsen a child’s behavior because it causes them to become angry and hostile, and the ordeal becomes a power struggle (“Wrong Signal” 8). For example, a child can try to gain power and express their anger by fighting back physically with their parents, other children in school, or with their siblings. Children may also try to gain power by ignoring and defying their parents, such as breaking rules or deliberately repeating an action. Dr. Murray of family research noted, “How ironic it is that the behaviors for which parents spank their children are liable to get worse as a result of spanking” (Robinson). The more a parent uses corporal punishment, the more they cause their child to misbehave.

Although corporal punishment sends the wrong message, many parents believe it is a positive and clear form of discipline. Parents believe the Bible is a strong supporter of spanking. Therefore, corporal punishment it is a positive act (Child Discipline). Supporters of physical discipline also believe hitting a child clearly implies that they were wrong, and they will not commit the act again. These people suppose that if they do repeat the action, hitting again and again will eventually prevent the child from misbehaving. This implies that physical pain is the easiest way to relate a clear message to such a young child (Vockell). However, this is incorrect. In order to teach a child a lesson in a clear and positive manner, it is better to explain consequences and take away privileges (Straus 52). Unlike corporal punishment, this approach relates a clear and constructive message to the child.

However, supporters of corporal punishment disagree by arguing that hitting or spanking a child improves beh

Some topics in this essay:
Discipline Supporters, Andero Stewart, Vockell Children, Stewart Instead, Ministry Health, Discipline Parents, Child Discipline, University Hampshire, James Dobson, Dr Murray, corporal punishment, physical discipline, child discipline, form discipline, unclear message, teach child, anti-social behavior, exposed corporal punishment, exposed corporal, term psychological, low-self esteem, short term psychological, worsen child’s behavior, corporal punishment suffer, children exposed corporal,