Nietzsche's View On Truth
In the first section of Beyond Good and Evil (BGE) it is clear that Nietzsche’s view on truth is that there is no such thing as ‘T’ruth. This is because God – according to Nietzsche – is dead, and God was the soul guarantor of Truth. Without God, we now have to accept that there are only competing, irreconcilable perspectives on the world. This is otherwise known as Nietzsche’s Perspectivism. Nietzsche is opposed to all kinds of absolutist thought (the idea of a universal truth) and only God, when he was alive, could guarantee such absolution. This is one of the reasons why Nietzsche considers the death of God the biggest thing to happen in the history of the universe as it also marks the end of Truth. After such a catastrophe, everything is now a matter of perspective, and everything is a question of evaluation. There is no such thing as a value-free perspective and we must move beyond the old ‘dogmatic’ metaphysical systems. This theory later leads on to Nietzsche’s concept of the Ubermensch.In the first aphorism of On The Prejudices OF Philosophers, Nietzsche accuses past philosophers of being prejudiced in valuing truth over untruth. Though in the book Nietz
Though such arguments do seem quite convincing upon first inspection, there are many problems that arise. For example, aren’t there some things that are just true? Nietzsche as I mentioned earlier rejects Cartesian foundationalism on the grounds that it is not an immediate certainty. But what about a priori truths of rationalism? Surely a statement such as ‘all bachelors are unmarried men’ is a certainty? But Nietzsche could argue that it is not, given what he said about logic and mathematic – they are ‘necessary but false’. What we have to assume is that Nietzsche is implying that they are systems with their own internal rules, and what is taken for the truth we require is simply the consistency of these sets of internal rules rather than any correspondence between them and the world. Also Nietzsche’s account of truth is too complicated. Is he simply advocating a trivial relativism, where everything goes, epistemologically speaking? Another problem with Nietzsche’s arguments is what is the status of his claims about the world if he is moving beyond the concept of Truth? Why should we even consider to be swayed by his arguments if what he says is not true? For purely saying that there is no truth is a truth in its own right. With nothing being True or immediately certain, Nietzsche goes on to question to be what we consider the ‘True’ world. From Plato to Kant, philosophers have insisted that there is a True world somewhere, a world that is beyond the world of false appearances. It was Kant that posited the idea of a thing-in-itself, but thought that, as finite human beings with a specific perceptual make-up, we would never be able to access it. Nietzsche thinks that
Some topics in this essay:
Philosophers Nietzsche,
According Nietzsche,
Truth Truth,
Perspectivism Nietzsche,
Plato Kant,
Due Nietzsche’s,
BGE Nietzsche’s,
God Nietzsche,
Truth Nietzsche,
Truth God,
‘i think’,
truth truth,
nietzsche’s view,
statement ‘i think’,
dead god,
nietzsche argues,
truth god,
internal rules,
statement ‘i,
prejudices philosophers,
leads nietzsche’s,
nietzsche’s view truth,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1154
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Nietzsche View On Truth Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|