Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

A stylistic critique of Aeneid 10

This passage sees the entrance of Mezentius to battle, at the promptings of Jupiter, and the replacement of Turnus whose fate will be determined another day. In general terms, I think it is interesting to recognize the idea of fate in this passage as it is shows its face directly in line 740, as Mezentius about to slay Orodes puts his faith in fate and his destiny is in the hands of the ‘Father of the Gods and the King of men’, intriguing and somewhat ironic as Vergil condemns Mezentius in 7.648 as a ‘contemptor divum’. This fateful passage truly illustrates Vergil’s use of Mezentius as a forerunner to the destiny of Turnus as he must meet and fall before Aeneas.

As a particularly poignant moment in the poem Vergil employs Homeric allusion for the sake of adding striking detail to the scene. The first line uses a chiastic arrangement in ‘densos alacer Mezentius hostis’; Vergil depicts Mezentius with no less that the raging fury associated with Turnus. The word ‘alacer’ brings to the surface a shining example of epic characterization, the epithet, mainly memorable because Vergil employs the same terminology to Turnus in book 12 line 337 thus establishing a forceful link between the two again pointing to Mezent


ius prefiguring Turnus’ destiny as he will meet Aeneas in battle and will fall. Further to both themes is Acron’s depiction as ‘infelix’ again an epic epithet and once more it suggests that luck is a major factor in the episode.

Moving away from the idea of fate, Connington suggests a reference to the Homeric phrase‘gaia melaina’ with ‘atra humum’, whether intentional or not this is the forerunner to many Graecism’s and Homeric references in this passage. Other examples include the Greek accusative ‘paeana’ perhaps picking up Achilles speech to the Greeks after the death of Hector in Iliad 22.365 a particularly apt epic reference in this instance. Further to this is Vergil’s probable adaptation of Homer’s sleep of bronze (Iliad 11.241). Connington also points out the similarity between lines 734-735 and Iliad 7.243 indeed Mezentius’ victim Orodes has forecast the imminent fatality of his slayer just as Hector did to Achilles and indeed is met with the same abrupt dismissal, and again 736 with Iliad 16. 862-863 where the failing Patroclus has been addressing Hector; the question is why does Vergil choose to use so many Homeric references in this passage, apart from firmly establishing the epic nature of this scene the answer appears unclear. Perhaps it is just a result of the latter stages of the Vergilian epic having firmer roots or coincidences in subject matter with the battle scenes of the Iliad. Further to this is Mezentius’ depiction as an

Some topics in this essay:
Furthermore Vergil, Vergil’s Mezentius, Iliad Mezentius’, Mezentius’ Indeed, Orodes Mezentius, Hector Achilles, Hector Iliad, , Jupiter Orodes’, Gods King, line 740, homeric references passage, vergil employs, idea fate, line 743, slay orodes, lines 734-735, word play, monosyllabic line, vergil chooses, homeric references,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1002
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers