A stylistic critique of Aeneid 10
This passage sees the entrance of Mezentius to battle, at the promptings of Jupiter, and the replacement of Turnus whose fate will be determined another day. In general terms, I think it is interesting to recognize the idea of fate in this passage as it is shows its face directly in line 740, as Mezentius about to slay Orodes puts his faith in fate and his destiny is in the hands of the ‘Father of the Gods and the King of men’, intriguing and somewhat ironic as Vergil condemns Mezentius in 7.648 as a ‘contemptor divum’. This fateful passage truly illustrates Vergil’s use of Mezentius as a forerunner to the destiny of Turnus as he must meet and fall before Aeneas. As a particularly poignant moment in the poem Vergil employs Homeric allusion for the sake of adding striking detail to the scene. The first line uses a chiastic arrangement in ‘densos alacer Mezentius hostis’; Vergil depicts Mezentius with no less that the raging fury associated with Turnus. The word ‘alacer’ brings to the surface a shining example of epic characterization, the epithet, mainly memorable because Vergil employs the same terminology to Turnus in book 12 line 337 thus establishing a forceful link between the two again pointing to Mezent
Some topics in this essay:
Furthermore Vergil, Vergil’s Mezentius, Iliad Mezentius’, Mezentius’ Indeed, Orodes Mezentius, Hector Achilles, Hector Iliad, , Jupiter Orodes’, Gods King, line 740, homeric references passage, vergil employs, idea fate, line 743, slay orodes, lines 734-735, word play, monosyllabic line, vergil chooses, homeric references,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1002
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
