Working with animals in research is essential to continued medical progress. Many medical breakthroughs have been made by the benefits of animal research (“Animal”). If the vaccine to prevent and cure polio were not developed in monkeys (Murray), polio would kill or cripple thousands of children and adults in one year (“Animal”). Insulin-dependent diabetics would not have insulin, a benefit of research on dogs, without animal research (Murray). Lack of medication to control high blood pressure would cause sixty million Americans to risk deat

Henry Spira, along with many other animal rights activists, deserves the credit for changing the way cosmetics are tested. These activists saved the lives of many rabbits through creative and nonviolent movements. One of Spira’s dramatic efforts was his 1980 protest against the cosmetic manufacturer Revlon. Spira and other animal rights activists ran full-page ads in newspapers showing bandaged white rabbits with the caption; “How many rabbits does Revlon blind for beauty’s sake?” Some activists even put on rabbit costumes and marched in front of Revlon’s corporate offices (Hyde 18).

There have been many animal rights organizations created. Some tolerate experiments in which animals do not suffer. Others evaluate the use of animals in research on the basis of how much the research will help humans (Hyde 15). Henry Bergh founded the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) in 1866. ASPCA was the first organization of its kind in the United States devoted to the protection of animals. The society helped pass the first anti-cruelty law in the United States (“American”). The Humane Society of the United States agrees that some animal research is necessary for the discovery of lifesaving scientific advances, but they work toward the replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal experiments (Hyde 22). The Humane Society’s mission is to reduce and eliminate harm to animals used in research, testing, and education (“Our”). The American Humane Association does not seek to abolish the use of animals by and for the betterment of mankind or other animals, but to prevent cruelty or mistreatment (Hyde 22-23).

Some animal welfare organizations do not believe animals should be made to suffer in order to produce a better lipstick. The Draize eye-irritation test is one procedure that has raised a great deal of controversy. In the spring of 1933 a woman known as Mrs. Brown applied mascara to her eyelashes. In doing so, Mrs. Brown got some of the dye in her eyes. Mrs. Brown suffered constant pain for three months and lost her sight. This case played an important role in the passage of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, which gave the federal Food and Drug Administration the power to prohibit the sale of harmful cosmetics (Hyde 15-17).

Luckily, new methods of testing f

Some topics in this essay:
Murray Lack, Cosmetic Act, Biomedical Research, Humane Association, Virginia O’Brien, AIDS Getty’s, Compassion Animals”, Revlon Spira, Jeff Getty, Ferid Murad, animal research, animal rights, standard compassion, food drug, biomedical research, cell cultures, animal research “animal”, animals research, research “animal”, “the corporate standard, corporate standard, “the corporate, standard compassion animals”, corporate standard compassion, animal rights activists,