“The image of the pitch-helmeted outsider dressed in khaki shorts arriving on the shores of some remote and exotic palm tree island to set up camp and study the lives of the ‘native’ has become legendary.”

More recently lifestyles within ‘our own’ culture have been the focus. ‘Deviant’ groups like drug users, and later, more banal aspects of social life such as ‘Life in classrooms’ (Woods 1979) have been studied. Student life would stem from this recent study of routine life. It could also provide an element of contrast and comparison, as the student society at QMUC could be seen as ‘anthropologically strange’ because it is likely to differ from the culture or lifestyle of the researcher or the readers of the study.

Ethnography is based on direct observation and could involve the researcher living with students at QMUC in the Halls of Residence to experience and share i

However a researcher could take the middle ground and hold on to the importance of providing a detailed description from first hand experience spent with the students whilst still giving the ethnography a theoretical background on which to develop.

Another advantage of ethnography lies in its empirical format. The researcher goes directly to students, or ‘straight from the horses mouth’ to collect raw data.

n their lives rather than watch from afar. The data, accumulated over a long period of time, can then yield a privileged insight that a less ‘hands on’ method could not achieve. This method would also avoid the use of secondary data, like students’ statements, that would not give the same quality or reliability of data.

Some topics in this essay:
Halls Residence, QMUC Personal, , students qmuc, existing theories human, student life, advantage ethnography, access students, student culture, existing theories, direct observation, theories human, QMUC Halls, denscombe 1998p73 “how, “how description, description culture, describe events explained, events explained denscombe, explained denscombe 1998p73,