October Sky
A very debatable topic is that of religion. It is known that one does not have to discuss their own religion nor the reasons as to why he/she feels that way. But it is known that two of the most common religions, Judaism and Christianity, put belief in one collection; the Bible. At one point in time people were persecuted for speaking against the Bible. But recently a new type of archeology has raised, that being the “New Archeology”. Scholars Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman use their extensive research to revise the common belief that the Bible is a historical and factual map of events that took place even before 10th century B.C., and put forth the idea that the Bible is a story written by later powerful figures of the 6th and 7th centuries B.C. The main thesis for “The Bible Unearthed” is explored through new perspectives and methods and brings forward the illegitimacy of the Bible, including the failure of proving the era of the patriarchs, the Exodus and the conquest of Canaan. Through the methods of the “new archeology”, new ideas were conveyed by Finklestein and Silberman. These methods include looking at
The story of Moses also carries a 7th century feeling to it, being that his confrontation with the Egyptian pharaohs is very similar to that of confrontations between King Josiah and the Pharoe Necho (pg 71). Due to the Egyptian history that is either depicted, or just as importantly, not depicted (such as names) helps strengthen the authors view that there was no real Exodus, nor a Passover on a single date, but rather it was centuries of people uniting together against powers that they did not wish to be part of or wanted to fight against. The first aspect of the Bible in which Finklestein and Silberman discuss is the era of the patriarchs. Archeologists have been very unsuccessful in proving the era of the patriarchs due to the fact that the dates and backgrounds do not match those of real history. For one, the dates of the patriarchs (such as birth and death dates) are not reasonable. For example, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob all are given life spans of well over one hundred years each (pg 35). Not only is a life span of over one hundred years quite rare nowadays; but for those time periods the life span was no longer than 30 or 40 I’m sure. Two parts of the Bible indicate that Exodus took place four hundred and eighty years before construction of the temple of Jerusalem and the fact that Israelites were enslaved four hundred and thirty years before Exodus concludes that two hundred years are overlapped in the lifespan of the patriarchs, concluding that it was 2100 BC when Abraham left for Canaan. Also, at the time of Genesis there is no proven population movement in which the “Amorite migration” occurred. Another contradiction with the time of the patriarchs includes the mentioning of using “gum, balm and myrrh” which were really not traded with the Arabians until the 7th century BC, conflicting with the fact that the actual even were supposed to happen hundreds of years earlier. In fact, those items were supposedly carried by the beas
Some topics in this essay:
Finklestein Silberman,
Canaan Genesis,
Asenath Zaphenath-paneah,
King Josiah,
According Bible,
Due Egyptian,
Bible Unearthed”,
Asher Silberman,
Iron Age,
Isaac Jacob,
7th century,
king josiah,
era patriarchs,
conquest canaan,
“the bible unearthed”,
“the bible,
proving era,
exodus conquest,
patriarchs exodus,
patriarchs exodus conquest,
century bc,
finklestein silberman’s thesis,
story written,
7th 6th centuries,
proving era patriarchs,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1328
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on October Sky Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|