piaget, research paper, pendul
Jean Piaget’s Theory of Formal Reason has been widely, used and accepted in the field of psychology. Although many other psychologists have criticized Piaget’s Theory of Formal Reasoning and his Stages of Cognitive Development, it has also served as a foundation for others to build on. The Theory of formal reason works like a guideline to help us understand the cognitive development of infants throughout adolescents and even, to some extent, adults. Jean Piaget’s Pendulum Study is one of the most straightforward methods that demonstrate how formal reasoning is measured. The purpose of this study is not only, as a student, to practice researching and analyzing data but it also serves to help gain practical experiencing conducting a study and relating it to the presented theory of formal reasoning. In this paper, I have taken four individuals, two adults and two early adolescents and have mimicked Piaget’s pendulum study to see if his findings can be replicated. In the Oscillation of the Pendulum and Operations of exclusion Study, presented in reading 7 of the reading file an outline of the Stages of Formal Reasoning is shown. (Athabasca University, 2001). They begin w
Piaget’s original theory is in regards to cognitive development. He had developed stages, which describe what level of cognitive development a child will fall into. The theory of formal resoning builds on this theory by focusing on how children or adolescents develop formal reasoning. I have included a table (table 2) that shows Piaget’s stages of Cognitive development. This table was taken from page 109 of the Balk text (2001). Subject seems to understand question and proceeds to add two weights and swings, she then ads another 2 weighs and swings, she adds two more weights, swings and says, “It goes slower with more weight. It goes slower because there is heavier and it pulls it down.” The without adjusting the weight, she says, “I’m going to change the height”. (Length of string) she looks sceptical. She shortens the length of the string by two inches, swings and observes. She then removes all but two of the weights, shortens it another two inches (about half length) and swings. She comments, “You see the weight pulls it down, it is going faster without the weight. 1. She does not mention any observations gathered from changing the length. She proceeds to shorten the string again by two inches, then swings. She then shortens it all the way and swings. She looks happily surprised and says, “Maybe when it’s shorter it goes faster”. She tests this by lengthening to mid-length the swings. Then she lengthens it nearly all the way and swings. She says, “yes, it goes faster when it’s shorter because when I made it longer it would go slower”. 2. She adds, “ It is probably because she it is longer it has to swing farther”. After two or three minutes, she begins to add more weight and is swinging it from varying heights. I ask if she notices anything else. She said, maybe how far you drop it from but I don’t see much difference”. 3. She demonstrates pulling it back slightly then releasing then pulling it back further and releasing. She says, “If you pull it back father it might to a little faster. 4. She is quiet and thoughtful for two more minutes then says, “that’s probably it but for sure the weight and length of string will make it go faster or slower.”
Some topics in this essay:
RESULTS Data,
Formal Reasoning,
Limitations Piaget’s,
A’s B’s,
CONCLUSION Piaget’s,
Inoperant Links,
Separation Variables,
Athabasca University,
Pendulum Study,
Operations Using,
formal reasoning,
length string,
mix variables,
mixing variables,
cognitive development,
theory formal,
stage 3-a,
goes faster,
weights swings,
stages formal reasoning,
pendulum study,
mix variables testing,
proceeds add weights,
stages cognitive development,
piaget’s pendulum study,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 5299
Approximate Pages = 21 (250 words per page double spaced)
|