In the early 1920s, Giulio Douhet, an Italian and William Mitchell, an American were among the first theorists to realize the full implications of air power. Both theorists viewed that the use of air power would provide a significant edge in winning future wars. They shared the vision of using long-range strategic bombers to strike deep into enemy territory so as to destroy both the enemy's means and will to resist.1 The theorists had, however, differing views on the conceptual deployment of air power. These are mainly in the areas of whether air power should be employed jointly with other services, the type of targets, the type of bombing (aerial versus pinpoint), the perceived types and roles of the combat aircraft.

The conduct of the 1991 Gulf War and the 1999 Kosovo conflicts saw air power being deployed extensively. Both conflicts saw some relevance and contrasts in the theories as expounded by Douhet and Mitchell. The Gulf War, for example, very much employed the joint operations concept while the battle in Kosovo employed solely air power. The aim

Some topics in this essay:
Gulf War, Army Navy, Douhet Mitchell, Unlike Douhet's, Kosovo Conflict, War Kosovo, Contrary Douhet, Air Defence, War NATO, Army Marine, air power, gulf war, air defence, air campaign, mitchell's theory, ground forces, war kosovo, douhet's theory, command air, gulf war kosovo, air force, iraq airpower gulf, theory air power, storm iraq airpower, airpower gulf war,