The biological approach assumes that abnormal behaviors are due to somatic of bodily causes. Major emphasis is placed on behavior biochemistry. Supporters of this perspective emphasize the therapeutic actions of drugs is something poorly understood. Critics would argue that symptoms couldn’t be explained on a basis of physical maps or changes in our bodies independent of how we reach to environmental events. Thomas Szasz (1961) and Engel’s (1977) have strongly criticized such medical model for being outmoded. Engel’s proposes that, rather than leaving out psychiatry from medicine as proposed by Szasz, psychiatry should embrace both disciplines and adopt a “biopsychosocial” model. With Engel’s model, physicians could treat patients in the context of where the patient lives and the society, which may promote in subtle or overt ways maladaptive behavior.

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) played a very significant role in the development

of the biological approach. He believed

B.F. Skinner (1904-1990) argued that most animal and human behavior was

Piaget believed that mental abilities are adaptive and can be understood by studying how the child’s mind becomes assembled during development. He assumed that knowledge guides action and that knowledge develops through experience and action. Piaget also believed that the unit of mental life is a schema-the knowledge of how things are organized and related to each other.

Physiological need (hunger, thirst, warmth, extradra)

Some topics in this essay:
Psychological Paradigms, Psychoanalytic Approach, Jean Piaget, Humanistic Approach, Biological Approach, Thomas Szasz, Interestingly Freud, Cognitive Approach, Behavioral Approach, Abraham Maslow, primary psychological, primary psychological paradigms, psychological paradigms, id ego, humanistic approach, biological approach, cognitive approach, 4 primary, cited 1, 1 4, cited 1 4, conditioning type learning, cognitive psychology, 4 primary psychological, linked psychosexual development,