Pro Capital Punishment
Eliminating crime is a part of our duty as humans. Criminals have become part of our daily lives. Ensuring a just punishment for the rightly convicted is very important. Not everyone who commits a crime should be sentenced to death. For example, a petty thief should not be executed. However, a serial killer that preys on unsuspecting young children does deserve to die. "The worst criminal act is the willful and malicious taking of another's life." (Cullins 113) The death penalty should continue to be used to eliminate the people that have been convicted of severe crimes and as a result are detrimental to our society. "The founding fathers who adopted the Bill of Rights banning 'cruel and unusual punishment' had not problem with implementing the death penalty." (Eddlem 5) The death penalty serves as a deterrent to help reduce crime. It is very difficult to execute an innocent person due to the justice process. The death penalty is not applied based on race. I believe in a life for a life. "Men should be punished for their own crimes and not merely to deter others. That said, the death penalty undoubtedly does deter in some cases. For starters, those executed will no longer be around to commit any more crimes." (Eddl
Because the death penalty is an extreme punishment, the judicial system works diligently to ensure that the decision is correct. Wesley Lowe states that far more innocent lives have been taken by convicted murderers than the supposedly 23 innocents mistakenly executed in this century. (Lowe) "Paul G. Cassell of the Wall Street Journal explained how the 68 percent figure (error rate) is deceptive: After reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, the study's authors (like other researchers) were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed. Thus, the most important error rate -- the rate of mistaken executions -- is zero." (Eddlem 4) Even though there is a chance that an innocent person might be executed, the problem does not lie within the punishment. Smith, an advocate against the death penalty, believes that determining how the innocent got into prison in the first place will be the focus of the future over how to get the innocent out of prison. (Smith) Although a small number of death row prisoners have been released because DNA evidence has proven innocence, most have been released for political purposes or for technical reasons unrelated to guilt. (Eddlem 4) The risk of making a mistake someday is one worth taking when the deaths of several innocent victims can be avoided. In every capital case a unanimous jury of twelve citizens concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that an individual had committed a capital crime, usually first-degree murder. Further, in every one of these cases a trial judge and an assortment of appellate judges concluded both that the trial was fair and that the twelve jurors had acted reasonably in their determination. While such procedures do not give iron-clad assurances that innocent people have not been convicted, they place the burden of proof squarely upon the opposition. (Markman 85) em 7) The meaning of deterrence is to punish somebody as an example and to create fear in other people for the punishment. Most sane people would fear the extreme p
Some topics in this essay:
Lex Tallionis,
Street Journal,
Bill Rights,
Jeff Jacoby,
Thomas Eddlem,
Stephan Markman,
,
North Carolina,
death penalty,
Summa Theologica,
Wesley Lowe,
innocent person,
advocates argue,
innocent person executed,
person executed,
punished death penalty,
individual's life,
penalty continue,
innocent prison,
it's permissible,
advocates death,
teach it's permissible,
advocates death penalty,
capital punishment,
anti-death penalty advocates,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1367
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Pro Capital Punishment Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|