In Rachels’ The Elements of Moral Philosophy; it states, “Ethical Subjectivism is the idea that our moral opinions are based on our feelings, and nothing more”. Ethical Subjectivism is what the topic

statement is defining. When you make a moral judgment, such as the following: I disagree with homosexuality; what is your basis for the judgment? Society, your parents, your religion – these are all things that round out your personal preferences. By making such a statement, you are in fact just stating your own opinion (which is an extension of your preferences). In the dictionary, opinion is defined as: a belief or conclusion held with confidence but not substantiated by positive knowledge or proof; in layman’s terms, it is a statement that is biased by your likes and dislikes. By using Ethical Subjectivism, it clearly explains why moral judgments are just a branch of your preferences. Ethical Subjectivism is “…a theory about the nature of moral judgments. It says that no matter what moral judgments we make, we are only expressing our personal feelings, and nothing more.”

The topic statement also says “…moral judgments are a waste of time. The only thing at issue is what people like or don’t like”. The fact

Some topics in this essay:
Ethical Subjectivism, David Fume, , Moral Philosophy, moral judgments, ethical subjectivism, likes dislikes, homosexuality wrong, waste issue people, issue people don’t, hard prove, judgment paper, people don’t, waste issue, writing style, issue people,