Within the essay I will discuss the similarities of the two philosophers view points, how one may think Locke's outlook is better, then explain why it is not and why Hobbes ideas are correct and in fact should be lived by. ... When it come's to Locke, he believes that in his state of nature there should be not have laws or a sovereign that controls the people, that people are free to do whatever they please. ... Locke's view of a 'free to do whatever you want' type of state of nature is the reason why people would side with Locke's view. ... Locke's view of ...

• Word Count: 1330
• Approx Pages: 5
• Grade Level: Undergraduate

So in this essay I am going to argue against anarchism because in that situation people`s lives and their wealth would at every moment be endangered, or as Thomas Hobbes stated that the life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short, " and one other reason is the failure of philosophers to clearly explain how would people make decisions and coordinate their actions if they disagree, or if there is any conflict of interest. ... He states that "there will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State come to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, fro...

• Word Count: 2278
• Approx Pages: 9
• Has Bibliography
• Grade Level: Undergraduate