The second reason is ethic based saying that datas of researches are easy to manipulate. Since researchers want their research projects to be funded, accepted by the high rejection rate well-regarded journals and "refuting a prominent finding " and "raise doubts and win attention ", they choose to manipulate dates as shortcuts to achieve their goals. In ethic, the researchers' behaviours are morally unacceptable. Because the irresponsibility of the researchers doing research for their own money and fame but will cause severe future impact on other people of the society. The third reason is a natural science based question saying that datas of the researches are based on eye-catching, so it is easy to make mistakes when reading numbers off from the experiment and make the researches incorrect because of the inaccuracy of datas. .
As an international claimed medical science researcher, Dr. Ioannidis devoted his whole life in testing the result of medicine reports. His researches is authoritative, but it only contains experiences of his own research group which have limited perspectives. It is possible that Dr. Ioannidis and his research group make the same mistakes when doing researches as the other researchers do. So the Dr. Ioannidis article could be misleading, too. Also, as Dr. Ioannidis said, some of the researchers manipulate their data to refute "prominent finding " and "win attention ". Dr. Ioannidis says that 90% of the medical researches is incorrect, which this astonishing result shocked the whole science society and gained him attention. Did Dr. Ioannidis manipulate his data on the purpose to "win attention "? A considerable portion of the article praises about the profession background of Dr. Ioannidis which are not even related to this topic. For example, "he was unusually well armed: he had been a math prodigy of near-celebrity status in high school in Greece ". It again raised the possibility that Dr.