Contrary to the English psychologists, Nietzsche suggests that those on whom "goodness- was portrayed did not define "good,"" but rather it was the "good- that defined them. The "good- were considered to be the noble and the powerful. Only in comparing themselves with those who were beneath them hierarchically, were they really able to consider themselves "good."" .
A very well-known thinking of Nietzsche is the contrast between "Master Morality- and "Slave Morality."" Master Morality is the contrast between "good- and "bad,"" and Slave Morality is the contrast between "good- and "evil."" The question is often asked of the difference between these two concepts. They might say "What is the difference between bad' and evil'?- According to Nietzsche, the two words, "bad- and "evil- may not necessarily have completely different meanings, but it is the way that they are compared and understood with reference to the word "good- by the Masters and the Slaves. In Master Morality, the "good- are considered the masters, having strength, power, wealth, and happiness. These masters, also known as noble men, are very simple and live in the present. They do not allow accidents, misfortunes, and enemies to bring them down. On the other hand, where Nietzsche portrays the difference between "bad- and "evil,"" Slave Morality is the complete opposite. A slave, also known as the man of resentment, might be poor, unhealthy, weak, and powerless, but considers himself to be "good- and the masters to be "evil."" The reason for this is that slaves learn to "resent- and hate the power of the masters. Their focus is to reduce their perception of the masters as people who are bad, removing attention from themselves but, without much of an identity, they are unable to live in the present.
The characteristics used to describe the Slave Morality, or the men of resentment, illustrates everything Nietzsche opposes.