It was his right as well as his obligation to get first-hand materials and present facts to the public, regardless of his personal judgment. However, in Thomas' case, the facts were so uncertain that the fairness of the verdict was doubtful. Journalists often either inflate uncertainty (making the object seem more uncertain than it really is) or downplay uncertainty (making the object seem more certain than it really is)[3]. Because of the uncertainty of the incidents, reporters are capable of revealing the truth or distorting the truth. When Michael went to Bagley's Hotel with the hope of getting some news about the hangman, "he wasn't at all sure of himself"[2] because he must make a choice between his job and his reputation. As the only one who should get in touch with the hangman and make reports on the case, he needed to do his job, whilst he personally felt angry and unfair, just like other town people did. Now he was facing the dilemma: as a professional reporter, he had to present the facts and be as objective as possible to report news, but he was afraid of being judged by others if he was seen with the executioner. He had made his choice, in spite of realizing he was going to feel shameful and regretful.
Being in an awkward position, Michael seemed to be struggling to deal with the complex relationship between him and the hangman, K. Smith. It was Michael's uncertain attitudes and changing views to Smith that make the plot full of changes and make it hard to figure out what Michael would choose at last. Before he met Smith in person, he had already made presumption of a hangman's look. It was not necessary that a hangman must be "pictured as someone crude and ruthless in manner and masculine in building, a personification of death, the dark mystery"[4], but it was pretty much alike. However, when Michael first saw Smith, he felt surprised that Smith was "so meek and quizzical"[2], just like Mr.