Type a new keyword(s) and press Enter to search

Death Penalty

 

26 out of a 4.0 scale while attending all remedial classes. His standardized test scores in school also contributed to the cause considering he rarely scored about the twentieth percentile in any tests he took. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mr. Atkins by declaring it is against the United States Constitution's 8th Amendment's "cruel and unusual punishment" clause to sentence a mentally retarded person to death. .
             Mr. Atkins was clearly violated of his right to education in school. He became a victim of the tracking system, a system designed to help student like himself. The tracking system deliberately places sluggish performers in school together in the same classes so that they might learn at a much more comfortable rate. Meanwhile the remaining students are placed in the upper division track or the regular tracks which perform at substantially higher rates while keeping them isolated from the slower tracks. This isolation breeds the mentality that students feel superior to others who are placed in the sluggish tracks. These tracks may also be linked to the potential job types that students may for see in their future, .
             The verdict that spared Mr. Atkins of his life showcases that since was denied a proper education and received minimal help from society, he was obviously a victim of society and could not be put to death. The ruling by the Supreme Court set a new standard for special cases in which the death penalty can not obtained, sparing over one hundred prisoners along the way. .
             Since 1976, the year in which the death penalty was deemed constitutional in Gregg vs. Georgia, more that 800 people have been executed in 32 states that approved the uses of capital punishment. Of these 800 executions 480 took place between the years 1990 and 1998, a fourfold increase over those executed in the preceding 10years (Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health). This dramatic increase in the number of executions reaffirms the United States enduring philosophy of "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth".


Essays Related to Death Penalty