How is it possible that in Frankenstein's retelling of the events as they unfolded in his life he is able to remember word for word the various letters he received from his father and Elizabeth and other people and restate them to Walton with such unforced ease? Similarly how is Walton then able to include these letters in his retelling of the story without any interpretation of his own? I do not believe that such a recollection of ideas of possible and so I therefore question the entire validity of the frame story. .
Furthermore, by sheer nature, the absence of an omniscient knowing being as a narrator in Frankenstein, as in any first person narration, allows for the various narrators to interpret the facts of the story as they are retold to the reader, presenting the ideas in an increasingly prejudiced manner. Frankenstein's tragic fall from grace reads better with the Creature as an evil and dangerous being, in that it becomes easier for the reader to pity Frankenstein if some of Frankenstein's responsibility in creating the monster is then transferred to the evil deeds performed by the monster. Thus, we are to assume that Frankenstein has some ulterior motive, whether conscious or unconscious, in his retelling of the events of his life, and therefore to assume that not all of the observations of Frankenstein are accurate, especially in the case of the Creature. On a broader level, perhaps society as a whole reaps some benefit from the Creature being seen as sinful and malicious, in that when his actions are discarded as those of a cruel, inhuman being, the stereotypical views of beauty and magnificence, as upheld by society in its persecution of those who fall outside those standards, remain intact and unchallenged. By this reasoning, society bears no responsibility for the creation of the monster. He is merely an immoral and deviant being responsible for his own ill actions.