Others are more content to have moderate cuts now and eliminate subsidies over a period of time say five to ten years. Many developing countries especially the net food importers are concerned that the negotiations may result in an increase in world prices and say they would need help if that scenario were to materialize such as "special and different- treatment. Some countries, such as India, would like to see some additional flexibility for developing countries that would permit subsidies on some products to increase while other subsidies are reduced. As is evident by the fore mentioned details, in phase one there are many concerns by all parties and many issues that would have to be tackled in order for the negotiations to move forward.
As the negotiations move into phase two, new proposals come to the negotiating table many of which propose two separate time frames one for developed countries and a longer time frame for the developing countries. The developed countries propose more stringent and quicker cut backs in subsidies while the developing countries propose more flexible cut backs allowing them more time to adjust and allow their country to not be crippled by the outcome of the negotiation. The outcome to this point has been a compromise on both sides and the agreement thus far is to eliminate export subsidies at two speeds: five years for developed countries (10 years for developing countries) on one set of products; nine years for developed countries (12 years for developing countries) for the rest. Developing countries would continue to enjoy exemptions under article 9.4 for subsidies to support marketing, handling, upgrading and international support.
There are certain market access issues that are affecting the negotiations on agricultural trade among WTO nations. These are discussions on tariffs and tariff quotas, special agricultural safeguards, and a few others.