(855) 4-ESSAYS

Type a new keyword(s) and press Enter to search

Jungian Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious


            In understanding myths and religion cross-culturally, Carl Jung observed archetypal themes and entities. These themes and entities originated in the dreams and fantasies of individuals; however, their widespread occurrences suggest a link to the underlying connectedness of mankind. In this manner, Carl Jung establishes the collective 'dreams' of cultures and coins the term "Collective Unconscious" (Relke, 2007). The Collective Unconscious refers to instinct shared by all humanity (Collective) that manifests in universal images or concepts whose origin lies deep within the human psyche (Unconscious). Such images and concepts are known as archetypes and according to Jungian theory are core to understanding the stories shared in myths for they elucidate fundamental aspects of human psychology. In this manner the epic of Gilgamesh lends itself to analyses, particularly when surveying the representation of the anima.
             According to Jung, the anima refers to the archetypal female in mythology and religion as an embodiment of profound female attributes located in the male's subconscious. Dr. Joan Relke, in his article "The Archetypal Female in Mythology and Religion: The Anima and the Mother of the Earth and Sky" states that the anima is many times represented as goddesses in myths. In this vein Siduri, and Ishtar may be viewed as the anima manifest within the myth of Gilgamesh; moreover, Gilgamesh's final acceptance of his mortality and the ineffability of the eternal may be viewed as a reflection of the individual's relationship with the Collective Unconscious.
             When deconstructing myth in terms of archetypes it is important to consider that the psychological and psychoanalytical context underlying such an analyses is only one means of studying myth and does not exist without its critics. In "the structural study of myth" Claude Levi Strauss argues that shifting the focus of myth from an attempt to explain natural and cosmological forces to one rooted in psychology and sociology becomes "too easy"; for one can easily claim a gambit of psychological forces in explaining myths that cannot be verily disproved.


Essays Related to Jungian Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious


Got a writing question? Ask our professional writer!
Submit My Question