(855) 4-ESSAYS

Type a new keyword(s) and press Enter to search

Aristotle and Hobbes

             10 February 2004Aristotle and Hobbes Aristotle argues that valid conduct, as defined by the law, is acting in accordance with virtue. The choices and actions of .
             individual people do have worth, because these actions are chosen deliberately and therefore indicate the desires of men (1746). Desire is crucial to .
             understanding the construction of Aristotle's legal ideals, because the entire purpose of the law is to turn men's desires towards desiring that which is good. .
             Since the law seeks to create in men a habituation of the right desires, valid conduct becomes a definition of what it means to continually desire what the state .
             defines as good. The law applies even further as it seeks to forbid exactly what is not valid conduct; moreover it forbids exactly what is not in accordance with .
             the correct desires.Hobbes portrays valid conduct in the realm of the interactions between men. Instead of shaping the desires of individual men, the law instead .
             exists to create a perfect balance between the natural desires, actions, and liberties of men. The actions of men carry no intrinsic value; instead they only .
             have weight when they are applied within an institution. Valid conduct, therefore, can only apply where there is law (89). The law exists as a result of the .
             commonwealth, and exists to promote peace and the protection of liberty. The law does not exist because there is an intrinsic right or wrongness to actions. .
             Conduct only becomes invalid when it enters into a conflict of desire between two men, and this conflict is the entire purpose of the law.For both philosophers, .
             the idea of valid conduct cannot be separated from the law, and the law cannot be separated from justice. Hobbes and Aristotle contend that without a formal .
             system of law, there is no justice, as justice does not exist as an independent concept. Thus, what exactly is justice? According to Aristotle, that which is .
             just is that which is lawful, equal, and fair (1781-1785).

Essays Related to Aristotle and Hobbes

Got a writing question? Ask our professional writer!
Submit My Question