King answers to the clergymen's assertion that breaking the law is not the way to achieve the result Negroes seek. "Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all". King does not feel that they have broken the law; his definitive answer to the clergymen that a law that is not morally sound is not a law. Laws are made to protect the people not degrade and punish. As far as King is concerned Negroes will continue to do whatever is necessary, preferably non-violently, to obtain the legal and moral right that is theirs. If they are not allowed this peaceful expression of their needs they so desire it could lead to a much unpleasant action. He argues that tension exists, but because it has been unexpressed, it is unhealthy and potentially dangerous. History has shown if a person or people are ignored they will become violent and fight for their "God-Given" rights. King diligently explains that "black nationalist" groups are becoming prevalent in society and he has faith that the "Negro Church" has had a direct influence in keeping the violence from erupting. However, how can they be expected to stay complacent? .
King then expresses his disappointment with white moderates who, by opposing his program of nonviolent direct action, have become a barrier to progress toward racial justice. He describes white moderates to be people that are "more devoted to 'order' than to justice," who agree with King's goal but disagree with the way he chooses to reach the goal. He defends his actions against the criticisms, particularly their argument that he is in too much of a hurry. Responding to charges of extremism, King claims that he has actually prevented racial violence by channeling the natural frustration of oppressed people into nonviolent protest. He asserts that extremism is precisely what is needed now; but it must be creative, rather than destructive, extremism.
