" (2.2.608-610) Hamlet does not respond decisively to his father's orders, as Fortinbras would, and in Act IV Hamlet explains his delay, saying: .
Rightly to be great.
Is not to stir without great argument,.
But greatly to find quarrel in a straw.
When honor's at the stake. (4.4.53-56).
In other words, Hamlet states that he can't act until he is certain, until the grounds are "more relative." The source of his reluctance to act is his conscience, the commanding element of his knowledge and judgment in evaluating actions already done or in appraising plans of actions in the future. According to the etymology of the word itself, the junction of con with scientia forms conscientia which means a "knowledge with." "Conscience unites reason, moral obligation, and fear in ways which would have seemed self-evident to an audience in 1600 .Going well beyond a guilty feeling or revelation of guilt, it points forward as well as backward in time, and provides guidance to action" (Frye 179). Professor Roland Frye's conclusions support the argument that a morally conscientious man is not doomed to inaction, but impelled to a slowness to action when weighing that actions good or evil results. When confronted by a moral dilemma, such as what suicide presents, Hamlet responds by deliberation, by first evaluating the morality involved, which results in his delay of action but not a lack of it:.
.
O! that this too too solid flesh would melt,.
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew;.
Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd.
His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!.
How weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable.
Seem to me all the uses of this world. (1.2.129-134).
Depressed by his father's death and distraught by his mother's impure remarriage, Hamlet wishes that he could become nothing more than a vapor and simply vanish. He contemplates suicide, but his conscience reminds him of the moral prohibition against suicide, and he wishes that God's prohibition of suicide would disappear, too.