Sharing is Caring, Or Is It?
Sharing pirated music over the Internet just became a lot more hazardous. The round of recent lawsuits caps a broad investigation that began in June, when music companies said they would begin tracking down heavy users of file-sharing networks. By using a file-sharing program online, anyone can easily determine how many files a particular user is making available to others. These files include those in the format of music, video, picture, or even software. These files are traded many times over by millions of online “pirates”, people who upload and download files to one another in an ongoing sea of controversy. Interest groups such as the RIAA feel that online file-sharing perpetrates several regulations over music made in the past, and also state that this “piracy” is leading to many losses suffered by record companies and musicians. However, the American public feels differently; to many, online file-sharing is something they have been practicing carefree for several years now. In a bold and risky move, the largest music companies made good on months of threats to crack down on users of file-sharing networks, filing separate lawsuits against 261 individuals in federal courts across t
The music companies offered some users a form of amnesty under which individuals not currently under investigation must pledge not to share pirated music over the Internet. Users who sign an sworn statement promising to delete illegal copies of songs on their computers and take other steps are promised to not be sued for their past actions, the recording companies said. File-sharing companies say they don't believe the lawsuits will significantly diminish use of their software. Wayne Rosso, the president of Grokster Ltd., a file-sharing company that has been sued by music companies affirmed this notion by saying, It even seems that the recent court cases would be effective in scaring away file-sharers. However, many of the people “breaking the law” appear to be uninterested and ignore the requests of the RIAA. Many are too uninterested in news coverage to even be aware of the suits. Perhaps many of millions of people who are currently “breaking the law” feel that the accusers will not target them. After all, not even the RIAA can find a needle in a haystack. "Nobody likes playing the heavy and resorting to litigation, but when you're being victimized by illegal activity there is a time you have to stand up and take action”. The recording companies promised to file thousands more lawsuits against individuals swapping illegal copies of songs in coming months. Reflecting on the controversy surrounding socio-economics online, Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America, the music industry's chief lobbying group stated, Interestingly, statistics show that the majority of Americans feel that the aggressive attacks launched by the RIAA feel that the series of lawsuits and court cases are nothing short of ridiculous. A lawsuit filed in Boston against Noor Alaujan, a 22-year-old resident of Cambridge, Mass cited hundreds of songs that were allegedly downloaded illegally, including Eric Clapton's "Tears in Heaven" and Sade's "Somebody Already Broke My Heart." Ms. Alaujan didn't
Some topics in this essay:
Informed Opinion,
Background Sharing,
Association America,
Boston College,
Music Store,
Grokster Ltd,
Napster Inc,
Internet Users,
Ms Alaujan,
York Interestingly,
recording industry,
music companies,
file-sharing programs,
users file-sharing,
recording companies,
pirated music,
federal court,
industry association america,
“breaking law”,
file sharing,
association america,
filed federal court,
pirated music internet,
recording industry association,
users file-sharing networks,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1399
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Sharing is Caring, Or Is It? Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|