“ Cruelty and despair can be suffered not only at the hand of man, but at the hand of nature in circumstances of illness, particularly terminal illness. “

Why does society find killing wrong, or for some if not always wrong, then only can it be justified in special circumstances, say in a war or in self defence. Why can killing not be justified in the case of compassion, in the case of a mercy-killing like euthanasia.

My project is investigating euthanasia, the bringing about of a gentle and easy death. The word which was derived from the combination of Greek words, ‘Eu’ and ‘Thanatos’ means good death.

I am looking in particular at the moral, medical and religious views, and how they compare and contrast with one another. Since there are many varied views on the subject of euthanasia, I will unfortunately not be able to cover them all in this project.

The question I will be trying to answer is, ‘ Is killing always worse than letting die.’

My project will be covering the topics of moral views, medical views, religious views, views of different organisations, and the publics view.

Some topics in this essay:
Pro-Life Alliance, Letting Die, Medical Journal, Roman Catholic, Real Difference, Die Introduction, Humanist Society, Catholic Church, Euthanasia Morally, killing worse, worse letting, killing worse letting, letting die’, worse letting die’, letting die, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, ‘is killing worse, roman catholic, deliberate act, ‘is killing, lethal injection, British Humanist, british humanist society, worse letting die,