Abstract of Depression
Joiner's article (this issue) is a welcome contribution toward clarifying the role of interpersonal factors underlying depression chronicity. We believe, however, that three issues need to be considered regarding an interpersonal research agenda. First, Joiner's proposal would benefit from a discussion of the evidentiary requirements that risk factors must meet. Second, our reading of the literature suggests that interpersonal processes interact with cognitive processes that involve the activation of depressive knowledge structures and that these processes do meet criteria as a possible causal risk factor. Finally, Joiner's global concept of depression chronicity fails to recognize important differences in the mechanisms underlying each of the phenomena of episode prolongation, relapse induction, and recurrence as well as the changes that might occur in these processes with repeated episodes. Key words: cognitive reactivity, depression relapse/recurrence, cognitive factors. Although our understanding of the processes implicated in acute episodes of major depressive disorder has expanded in recent years, relatively little work has gone into exploring mechanisms associated with the chronic and recurrent nature of this disorde
A strength of Joiner's article is his description of the various depression-linked interpersonal transactions. His distinction between erosive and self-propagatory processes, for example, is a useful characterization of the ways in which depression impacts on patients' interpersonal capacities. However, this taxonomy, as presented, is still primarily a set of observations. Joiner offers little in the way of a theory that, at least conceptually, would explain how these specific processes arise. Our reading of the literature suggests considerable support for a view of interpersonal transactions as interacting with cognitive processes that involve the activation of depressive knowledge structures. Joiner admits to this possibility when he nominates "rumination is the `cognitive motor' that drives such behaviors as excessive reassurance-seeking and negative feedback-seeking." In fact, recent cognitively based approaches have been able to model depressive recurrence with some degree of success. r. With multiple determinants likely implicated in this aspect of depression (Judd, 1997), clarifying the role of psychological factors could advance our understanding of this troubling feature of the illness. Joiner's article (this issue) is a provocative and timely example of such work, linking the problem of depression's chronic nature to the continued reliance on maladaptive interpersonal response styles. Moreover, cognitive reactivity has, in recent years, garnered empirical support as a possible causal risk factor according to precisely those criteria outlined by Kraemer et al. (1997). First, there is a strong association between a history of depression and processing differences under conditions of mildly depressed mood (Miranda & Persons, 1988). Second, recent da
Some topics in this essay:
Finally Joiner's,
CORRELATEâ€HOW Joiner,
THEORY BUILDING,
Teasdale Barnard,
,
Conti Belluardo,
MacLeod Mathews,
CBT Segal,
Miranda Persons,
Gemar Williams,
depression chronicity,
cognitive reactivity,
risk factor,
causal risk,
et al,
self-propagatory processes,
risk factors,
causal risk factor,
excessive reassurance-seeking,
cognitive processes,
knowledge structures,
causal risk factors,
identify causal risk,
requirements risk factors,
paykel et al,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1195
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Abstract of Depression Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|