Socrates is not a Sophist. The first major contrast between both methods of philosophy i

In court, he took a Sophist approach to proving his innocence. He started of by stating that he is not an eloquent speaker and that he does not know anything, again his Socratic ignorance. He tried to portray an image of an innocent old man who lives for philosophy. They can see that he is poor; he gave up his material possessions in pursuit of wisdom. He did not need them in order to gain wisdom. A philosopher should not worry about material possessions because when they die all they will take with them is their knowledge. All the possessions get in the way. He also included his accusers in some dialogue to show that they accuse him of things they do not know anything about or even care about. Socrates also tried to build his character by comparing himself to ancient heroes like Achilles and Hercules when he fought in the Peloponnesian wars. When he brought himself up, he brought down the image of the Sophists.

It was Socrates’ wandering around Athens and asking these important men questions that got him in trouble. The first phase of Socrates’ accusation is his wandering. The Sophists went around offering their services. Socrates went around proving the oracle’s prophecy. The second phase of his accusation was when he concluded that the men were wrong. Socrates would ask them questions and prove that they were not the wisest of men. He was little by little shortening the list of wise men. By showing that the other men were wrong and not wise and proving the oracle’s prophecy right, he as making his argument stronger, which

Some topics in this essay:
Sophists Socrates, Sophist Play, Socrates Sophist, Socrates Socrates, Achilles Hercules, , Looking Socrates, According Socrates, Luckily Plato, argument stronger, oracle’s prophecy, pursuit wisdom, saying sky, set prove, philosophy socrates, socrates sophist, socratic ignorance, socrates wisest, material possessions, proving oracle’s prophecy,