1. Philosophies of Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau
... a corrupt being, but Hobbes counters that by saying that a corrupt ruler is better than no ruler. Hobbes thought there to be nothing worse than "what proceeds from the subjects' disobedience, and breech of the covenants from which the commonwealth has its being," so this authoritative and fearful rule worked best for him. Unlike Hobbes' dim view of human nature ... the society without the use of a single ruler. It makes it so that "natural freedom, which is limited by the force of the individual," is governed by "civil freedom, which is limited by the general will." Each of these three ...
- Word Count: 907
- Approx Pages: 4
- Grade Level: Undergraduate