1. Animal Rights and Sentience
... context do nothing but prolong unnecessary suffering and mistreatment of animals, particularly in the United States. Professor Richard L. Cupp of Pepperdine University School of Law states that because "nonhuman animal species are incapable of significant moral responsibilities," and thus affording them legal "rights" just doesn't fit. Rather than focusing on rights for cats and dogs, [there should be a ... may not be deemed immoral, but nonetheless violate the animals' safety. Contradictory to Cupp's statement, members of the general public have expressed an interest in the legalization...
- Word Count: 1661
- Approx Pages: 7
- Has Bibliography
- Grade Level: Graduate