1. Law Long opinion - FIRAC
... requirement of spontaneity was not proven. Similarly in the case of S v Singh , it is can be seen from the trial transcript that Mr Fourie's hearsay evidence is not very spontaneous since he had gone of giving information that was irrelevant to the questions asked. Therefore hearsay evidence ... evidence might entail brings us to s 3(1)(c)(vi) of the Law of Amendment Act . In allowing the hearsay evidence, there would be prejudice against Mr Singh just as in S v CEKISO AND ANOTHER . With regards to that case, the hearsay evidence would have caused prejudice against the accused and ... r...
- Word Count: 5729
- Approx Pages: 23
- Grade Level: High School