However, I cannot find any excuses in this case, because I think that Mary should not kill her baby because of any difficulty in her life. I am sure that she could find the way out. For example, she could leave Alison at the orphanage while she does not crack her problems. .
I believe that none has the right to kill another person even his mother. We do not have any rights to make the decision who can live and who should die. The child has ``a piece`` of his parents' soul and each child is ``the part`` of his mother. I think the child is more important than the man's love. .
2. If I asked by the prosecutor and defense attorney, whether I will be able to set aside my initial reactions or preconceptions to render an impartial verdict, I can answer in the affirmative. I want to find out the facts, which can help me to change my initial reactions. I still cannot believe that the mother can coolly kill her child. I presume that Marry has the cogent reason to do the criminal act, especially if she was aware that she would kill her daughter. I think I can view this case objectively, because I have nothing against Mary even if she has done it deliberately. I do not have any strong feelings or ideas against her crime. I want to find out the reason why she did it, because I have several own possible explanations, and I want to check whether I wrong or right. I am sure that I will be able to go beyond my initial reactions to see the situation objectively. I am not the parent; I have never ever had any experiences related to the issues in this case. As a main argument I have against innocence of the defendant is that, the main Mary's responsibility as a mother is to take care about her child in any cases even very important or dangerous. She should not think only about herself, her feelings, and her personal future. Being mother, Mary should think first what could be better feat to her child and after to her.
Dehumanization - "Inherit the Wind" "Inherit the Wind" displayed the dehumanization of characters in two different manners. The first one, exhibiting hatred so deep towards someone that it demotes him (and we say "him" because no women were dehumanized in such a way) to a level lower than a huma...
The final verdict on the North American Free Trade Agreement, may in fact not fully be realized for many weeks, months, or even years. However, in the following essay, the advantages to both Mexico and Canada will be analyzed, as well as the disadvantages to Mexico. ...
The evidence that has convinced the rest of the jurors soon gets analyzed by juror No. 8, which causes the others think twice about their verdict. ... These facts changed the most of the jurors verdicts to "not guilty". ... He, too - in enmity - changes his mind to make the verdict a unanimous "Not Guilty". ...
Johnson analyzes political issues in the funding and treatment of mental illness as a "sideshow to the gun control debate" (Johnson 7). ... He also analyzes alternative verdicts for those claiming mental illness such at the Michigan "Guilty But Mentally Ill" verdict or Clark vs. Arizona's "guilty except insane" verdict. ... The objective and informative view of the essay offers perspective on how common the mental illness plea or verdict is brought up in legal cases and how a jury comes to such a verdict based on the variety of tests that have been used throu...
Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 16 2 Executive summary: Through this project we tried to analyze which factors affect the restaurant choosing behavior of IIML students. ... For analyzing what affects the students the most these parameters were divided into 2 categories benefits and cost, where benefits leads to value and cost to effort. ... Methodology Industry Analysis •Analysis of restaurant industry in India •Selection of restaurant segment based on increasing trend Preliminar...
Some of it's clause that will be analyzed further are decisions making, bribery and rights for citizens and the philosophy of innocent until proven guilty. ... This law once analyzed translates to the common council deciding together if a law should be passed, the law cannot be passed without the common council being aware of the decision. ... It translates to people not paying a judge in order to achieve a certain verdict or bribing those in power to benefit oneself. ...
The other jurors were not sure if the young man was guilty or innocence, but it was just easier for them to rely on their own personal feelings and bias instead of using a logical approach by analyzing the evidence they had. ... Once this was brought out he knew the verdict was innocence. ...
On April 29, 1992 the verdict, of the Rodney King trial, a pro-police jury set off riot in Los Angeles, causing fifty deaths, 1$ billion dollars property damage to the city, and over 2,300 injuries. ... This verdict sparked a massive riot in the South Central section of Los Angeles. ... The Rodney King trial's verdict led to a amazing show of, brutality, carelessness, and greed, in a riot that tore through the city of Los Angeles on the night of April 29, 1992. ... The LAPD did not really analyze the full potential violence of the riot, and did not even do anything to stop it. ...
Unfortunately, the states and counties that most often use the death penalty, applying it to a wide range of crimes instead of reserving it for the "worst of the worst", are also the most prone to flawed verdicts (Herbert 2002). ... it for the most heinous crimes, are also the most prone to flawed verdicts." ... In order to strongly support the argument, the author should view the death penalty system as a whole and analyze the factors affecting it. ...