The movie clearly illustrates what religion each character is, almost forcing the viewer to acknowledge the everyday stereotypes, although Gandhi himself is only seen as a man of spirit. The movie further explores the life of a simple Indian man and documents the serious poverty of his people. The British are portrayed as the all mighty master of all Indians. It is made clear the feelings of empowerment overcome by the English leaders. General Smuts is viewed as an unyielding referee with no tolerance for British rebelling. Gen. Smuts and his men constantly belittle the Indian people making the English seen the villain. From this, it seems that the eyes witnessing this in the movie might be one of an Indian, or one sympathetic towards the struggle of the Indians rather than the British fight to regain order. .
Due to the fact that Mohandas Gandhi really existed and all the events documented in this movie actual occurred, it makes it a hard task in creating it without noticeable bias. This movie definitely displayed the facts, leaving out the Hollywood storyline. The Indian resistance was sometimes violent on their part, and although it is not made a huge matter in the film, it is noted. The vivid scene of the massacre at Amristar in which over 1500 unarmed Indian men, women, and children were fired upon and killed evokes so much emotion. The movie continues to demonstrate the imperialistic ideals England had towards their colony when it shows the meetings of the British officers. To them this is not a reason to become intimidated, but instead to punish them in a "how dare you" matter. Of course that path involves violence and restraint, and what this movie does is it presents evidence of how they became the big bully. Through non-violent resistance, Gandhi makes the Indian people perceived to the world as the victims. This is definitely seen when the followers of Gandhi march to the salt mine in order to shut it down.
India had officially been a colony of the British Empire since 1858. Even before this, when the British East India Company was in power, a strong anti- British nation began to arise among the Indian people. British officials were usually racially discriminating towards the people and often violate...
Mohandas Karamchad Ghandi is often referred to as one of the greatest men that ever lived. He was also referred to as a conservative, a philosophical anarchist, a socialist, a pro-capitalist and a primitive communist. However, Gandhi was primarily concerned with means, not ideal systems. Albert E...
In Ghandi's passage he refers to modern civilization as something that people can be intoxicated by and that people who are surrounded by it are unlikely to think of the downsides to it (P308 1st paragraph) Ghandi thought that because of the all the inventions that modern civilization had brought about man was becoming less civilized. ... The work that people do is also a topic of disgust of Ghandi. Ghandi is quoted on p 109 as saying "This is civilization. ... The Declaration of Beliefs by the New Youth has the same thoughts as Ghandi. ... Ghandi and Dun J. ...
Arguably two of Ghandi's greatest non-violence quotes clearly outline how much he truly believed India could overcome the British. ... In conclusion Mahatma Ghandi's philosophies of non-violence is certainly an effective and non-destructive way to create change. ...
After that incident he visited India the home of Ghandi. Ghandi had a powerful influence on King Jr. promoting peace and love at the same time. ... He cannot drive hate; only love can do that" (Garraty/Carnes 1988) promoting love that of his influencer Ghandi, King Jr. did the same. ...
Surprisingly, Fraser devotes many pages to his dismantling of the modern medieval movie, Braveheart, a favorite to many when it debuted in the mid-1990s. ... Notable films like Zulu and Ghandi hold the torch in this section for their superior casting, acting, and accuracy to real events, although Fraser spends ample time acknowledging dozens of other minor films which, in their own right, met the strict standards he uses to measure the quality of a motion picture. ... Fraser offers a simple technique of reviewing a movie by plainly admitting that he is looking for historical accuracy. ...
Some examples of negative viewpoints of diversity are those of Giuseppe Mazzini and of Indira Ghandi. ... Ghandi felt that the people of India were too different and therefore it was too hard to unite. ...