And in the third rule there is an obvious emphasis that the right to elect and be elected, to participate in the all-nation referendum does not extend to the citizens judged incapable by a court as well as those held in places of confinement on a court's sentence. The last, but not least one implies that citizens of the Republic have the equal right to serve in a public office and that the requirements for candidates for public offices shall be conditioned only by the character of the office duties and shall be established by law. Furthermore, the legal issues of the people's right to participate to governance can be supported by the Article 3, where is emphasized that the people shall be the only source of state power.
Nevertheless, there is still a low activity of people in electoral system and its relevant institutions, which is, first of all, caused by low awareness of the election procedures and limited ability to solve problems through deputies and legislative authorities as well as to become deputies themselves. Secondly, in my opinion, there is a problem with Kazakhstan's political transformation, where the political elite is the initiator of reforms in the country. But, furthermore, civil society also until recently did not propose any significant initiatives in this direction, there are remained the lowest socio-political activity of Kazakhs and their reliance on the initiative "from above". In addition, the next reason is that such a high degree of political apathy of Kazakh population is, primarily, due to the fact that democratic values are recognized in principle, but have not perceived the mass consciousness as a real tool to solve the problems facing society. And also from my point of view, the population of Kazakhstan more worries about the problems of material well-being, social order and security, rather than democratic principles and the human rights. The liberal approaches in politics and economy gradually have been substituted by the strengthening of a state.