If someone wanted to use the process of nuclear transplantation to make a clone, they would take those generic embryonic stem cells and they would implanted them into a surrogate mother who would eventually birth the cloned baby animal. This process used to make clones is called "reproductive cloning." .
Scientist and researchers in the medical field want people to under stand the difference between reproductive and therapeutic cloning. People had no confusion about the two terms until the controversial Italian fertility doctor, Severino Antinori, described his plans for cloning human babies as "therapeutic cloning for treating infertility". Now mainstream scientists who want to avoid association with Antinori are calling to rebrand non-reproductive cloning ("C" Word 3). I think this would be the ideal thing to do seeing as how very few people actually understand the difference anymore. I have found that most of the people I talk to everyday do not know the difference and think anything attached to the word cloning means to make a copy of another being. .
The idea of cloning has been around as early as the early 1900s. Some of the first movies to deal with the concept of the creator being over taken by his creation are present in such films as: The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919), King Kong (1933), and Dr. Strangelove (1964)" (Rabalow 39). Remember that movie with the mad scientist who makes his own children in his laboratory? There are so many movies out there with this early "Frankenstein" plot; the idea itself has been cloned over and over again. .
A famous book called "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley (1932), explored the idea of a future world of happy cloned human drones. No one was born in this future; they were grown in bottles. Which means no more of that pesky family thing to worry about. There was no more love for fellow humans to get in the way of work or recreation.