Thus they argue alongside these lines, and this is because it serves the interests of the people and cares to a greater extent about the welfare of the citizens.
However, Plato who wrote centuries ago came to differ with the above arguments which portrays democracy as the saviour of the majority from the oppression of the few who are the elite of other types of government regimes. Most of Plato's contributions on the debate of democracy tried to shed light to the minds of many and making them aware of the negative aspects about democracy. He came with a critic to the subject of democracy because people tend to be blind folded by viewing things as accepted at their face value. Plato as a philosopher criticized democracy as a government not fit to fully represent the eligible citizens or the majority. He even went to the extent of propounding an ideal form of government, which he prioritized as better than democratic regimes and others. In his argument, he started with what he called the best regime which is aristocracy to the worst which is tyranny. His hierarchy of listing forms of government are outlined in detail in the following manner starting from the best to the worst.
Plato's first and best government is aristocracy; this is a case in which the ruler is a philosopher, someone whose soul has been educated through the contemplation of arts and the exercise of the intellect. Having studied philosophy, this ruler would know the true virtues and, therefore, he would be able to lead people towards wellness and prosperity. Since the ruler would be virtuous, he would not want to deceive and abuse the citizens. In scrutiny of his aristocratic government, one would come to the point of saying that it was a reasonable ideal proposition because for equality and fairness to take place in a stratified society, there is a need for people who understands the life of different classes, thus making it possible to try to serve the interests of different classes without discrimination.
