Sometimes the only way to end the continual feelings of a crime committed against you or someone you know, is to end the life of the person who committed that crime. In one instance, Dawud Mu"Min who was serving a 48-year sentence for the 1973 murder of a cab driver when he escaped a road work gang and stabbed to death a storekeeper named Gadys Nopwasky in a 1988 robbery. This crime would have been prevented if the death penalty was given instead of life imprisonment. There are many examples of when the only type of punishment that actually stopped convicts from committing crimes was the death penalty. An anti-death penalty argument might be composed of the idea that the use of the death penalty is not holding a person's life to the highest degree. On the contrary, not giving the death penalty for example, a murder, would not be holding life to the highest degree. "It is by exacting the highest penalty for the taking of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life.". (Edward Koch) If life is truly the greatest asset people posses, the only equivalent punishment for taking such a gift would be to end that person's life. .
The use of the death penalty not only gives justice to where it is needed, but also makes space for those who should be in jail. Usually if prisoners are not given the death penalty, they are given life in prison. So for the rest of their lives, they use jail space, the state's money, and there is also the possibility of escape. According to TIME Magazine, it costs $3.62 million more for life without parole than the cost of the death penalty. All these problems would be solved if the death penalty was given. There are times when repeated rapists and pedophiles are given parole because there is no space in the jails. These rapists and pedophiles would be in jail instead of on the streets if there was space made by the use of the death penalty.