.
In the United States Constitution, the Eighth Amendment states, "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual." Based on this definition, many people argue that capital punishment violates the Eighth amendment, because its character consists cruel and unusual in practice and law. .
Before we look into the constitutional issue of death penalty, we need to understand the definition of "cruel and unusual". First, we need to understand these words meaning in the dictionary. Then we need to understand why the framers of constitution consist this term in this Amendment. The definition of "cruel" could be found in the dictionary as "willfully or knowingly causing pain or distress to others." The definition of "unusual is "not common or not ordinary". The legal prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment originated in the English Bill of Rights in 1688. In 1583, the Archbishop of Canterbury turned the High Commission into Ecclesiastical Court for punishing heretics and critics of the crown. During the American Revolution, the Constitutional framers modify the Eighth Amendment which contain this term to ban the shockingly barbarous punishments that were so common during the colonial period. The British colonial government gave the colonist's a bitter memory by abusing their civil rights. Citizens were arrested and tortured without cause; people who are suspected of supporting the Continental Army were forced to confess by torturing method.
However, we should remember the term "cruel and unusual" can change its meaning during the time pass by. The Supreme Court have decided that " the Amendment is therefore was of an expansive and vital character" Therefore, the meaning and standard of the term "cruel and unusual" undoubtedly follow the progress of a maturing society. Therefore, I think although the framers of the Constitution wasn't intended to be against capital punishment, it doesn't mean capital punishment is automatically justified in the Constitution.