Cloning, right or wrong? Ethical or unethical? These are the questions that one must think of when the subject of Cloning arises. Ethics of human cloning has become a great issue in the past few years. The advocates for both sides of the issue have many reasons to clone or not to clone. Yes, cloning sounds marvelous but it sounds a little too good it you ask me. Now, cloning can benefit many people but it is also a serious harm to society. My job today is to educate you on the pros and cons of cloning. Now personally I find that cloning is a horrible way of making babies.
Cloning is not "creating" a human. Cloning is simply using the natural processes that already exist to produce a baby. If we compare cloning a baby and reproducing a baby the natural way we can see that cloning is a clumsy and inefficient way of doing that. The way in which we clone a baby is expert Scientists take a sperm and an egg, and give them pre-existing genetic structures and then the rest is self-explanatory. They even use a real womb to do it in. Cloning does not produce an exact copy of the person being cloned. What cloning does is that it copies the DNA/genes of the person and creates a duplicate genetically. But, what people don't understand about cloning the person will grow up with different traits and likes and dislikes. This is because that genetics does not wholly define a person and the personality it just simply creates a copy or a replica of the DNA of its donor. Clones would have a slightly different set of fingerprints, and their own personality traits unique from, if perhaps similar to, the DNA donor. .
The ethical parts that can benefit us is that it gives us the capability to create humans with identical genetic makeup to act as organ donors for each other for example we would be able to clone livers, lungs or even hearts. We can clone healthy heart cells into damaged heart tissue will lead to healing of the heart.
