The question on the existence of God has plagued man since our conception. It was our way as humans of explaining why things are the way they are. Humans cannot settle for not knowing, so any available is always welcome. What I believe bears no importance on the topic; I would hope that there is a God because it would seem like an awful waste, to create something just to have it ultimately destroyed. .
This breaks the world into two groups: Spirituality and Science. Science finds it difficult to believe that an all powerful being could create all the matter in the universe and still have time to watch over all he has created. Spirituality finds it hard to swallow that we all live basically to die serving no real purpose. If there is nowhere to go after we die, then why live at all? If science was correct then it would seem like the cycle of life would eventually have to stop somewhere, not just on earth but in this vast universe.
The first cause argument is the most valid dispute to me because everything starts with one. Nothing can be made from zero, and you can not get two without one. So life had to have begun as one. One fixation that could create another fixation that would later shape and mold the universe around us. It could not have been a particle because they are not made up of one piece of matter. The only cause of one could be a supernatural being, someone or something that had the power to occupy all the space that surrounded him with solar systems and life. That something is more than likely God.
Consciousness is also something that would need to be explained through science. I find it hard to believe that a subatomic particle created the way I feel during a situation, it does not form my opinions; my own free will shapes my life. If subatomic particles were the cause for life than would it not be safe to assume that all life would be exactly the same. A human is in essence the same as the next; two legs, two arms etc So what makes up our inner self's, because no two people are exactly alike on the inside.
The mind-body problem is one that entails many different theories. ... This view is a traditional solution to the mind-body problem. ... The mind is in constant interaction with the body. The body's sense organs create experiences in the mind. ... Substance dualism looks bad if you think that science has a role in the mind-body problem. ...
The Mind Body Problem Humans are free to do what they want, without this freedom there could be no morality. ... The mind is just as separate from the body as an engine is separate from the body of a car. ... Without a body we have no mind. ... Yet without parts of the body we can still posses a mind, and without parts of the mind we lose parts of our life. ... Occasionalism suggests that events between the mind and body are produced by God. ...
The mind is phenomenal assets to our lives to the point were in our mind the things we see and hear about is recollected as if it was real. The mind body problem is the perception on reality and whether this reality is truly real or is just the mind playing tricks. ... The problem is whether or not knowledge actually exists and if his knowledge is actually true. ... The mind and body problem is questioning the already known. ...
Mind - body dualism is defined as the mind and the body being separate but connected. ... The mind is private and is full of emotions and feelings. ... The new understanding of the human body that Leder suggests in order to avoid the problem with Cartesianism is the concept of the lived body'. ... I think that Rene Descartes gives a more convincing way of thinking about the body than Gilbert Ryle presents to us in "The Concept of Mind-. ... In "The Concept of Mind-, Ryle first explains about how "It maintains that there exist both bodies and minds; that there occur physical processes a...
Descartes was the first thinker to come up with the idea that the mind and the body were different and each worked independently of each other. He hypothesized that the mind was responsible for the reasoning, emotions and knowledge which are totally separate from the physiological functioning of the rest of the body. He said that the mind and the body work independently of each other but can still interact to produce different traits in people (Stanford). His distinction of the mind from the body allowed him to describe the reason why different people have dissimilar cognitive abilities. The d...
The Mind Body Relationship The relationship between the mind and the body is one of the philosophical problems that has never been adequately answered. ... When attempting to come a fair conclusion of how the mind and body relate, there are several important factors to investigate, such as: The problem with the mind and body, philosophical views of the mind and body, as well as psychological views. When contemplating if the mind body question is a philosophical question, or a psychological one, the first point to look at is the mind body problem. ... We can view the psychological-phenome...
The mind/body issue in philosophy asks many questions. ... In idealism and materialism, there would seem to be a similar impulse to make the mind/body problem go away. ... The problem is that we degrade our bodies, and such degradation has ancient roots. ... Descartes, realizing the problems with his dualism, attempts to construct a link between the mind and body with reference to the pineal gland (Meditation VI), that which houses the soul and the impulses of the mind. ... In this instance, mind and body do interact, and the mind seems to have a crucial role in driving the body. ...
Mind and Body In Meditation Six, Descartes argues the distinction between substance of mind and matter. ... The purpose of minds is to infuse what is perceived by bodies with reason and will. ... The problem with this causal resolution is that it still fails to explain how the immaterial mind can communicate with the material brain. ... The interaction of mind and body also poses significant problems amongst the people most willing to accept dualism. ... Descartes is unable to draw conclusive evidence to explain the mind body separation. ...
